In Part 2 of this series we compared planning for a team presentation to the way that aircraft manufacturers put together an aircraft from its major subassemblies. But even when everything fits together just right, when Boeing put together the first 787, they didn’t assume their computerized plans were perfect. They had to test fly the aircraft before they could put passengers on it. You should treat an important team presentation with equal care.
Practice is even more critical to a team presentation’s success than an individual one, because all the parts have to work together, and there is no substitute for hearing and seeing it for real.
The rehearsal process is absolutely critical and must be managed with care. Here are some other practical tips that can go a long way toward creating an exceptional presentation:
Plan transitions and handoffs. There are two ways to handle this. The team leader can act as a Master of Ceremonies and handle all of the transitions. The advantage is that only one person needs to practice the transitions. Or, each individual speaker can introduce the following speaker, which means that you have fewer moving parts and it looks a little less choppy.
Plan what-ifs. An old military dictum is that no plan survives first contact with the enemy, and the same applies to sales presentations. The customer will always have a vote in how the presentation flows. It’s important for the team to have flexibility built in, and for the team leader to follow the conversation closely and make adjustments as necessary.
- Plan to shorten or omit parts as necessary. Sometimes the portion that one person worked so hard over becomes irrelevant because the customer prefers to spend more time on something else.
- Plan on something going wrong. What will you do if someone is detained?
Present in conditions as close to realistic as possible. It will make presenters more comfortable by making the actual scene much more familiar. It will also help to identify peculiarities of the venue that might interfere with some of the choreography of the presentation, such as where people sit when not presenting.
Videotape and review. There’s no substitute for everyone seeing themselves performing individually and for the team to get a sense of how the entire presentation flows. It builds in safeguards against Murphy’s Law. When everyone knows who will be saying what, they are in a better position to step in and assist in case someone is detained and can’t make the meeting on time, or someone has a momentary brain freeze and forgets a part or can’t answer a question.
Deliver
There is a tendency among many sales teams to bring more people to team presentations than necessary. It’s understandable, because it seems it would demonstrate your depth of resources, and because you might need a specialist to answer a question about some esoteric aspect of the offering. Yet my interviews with top executives indicate that it can actually backfire.
One of the most common “don’ts” that came out of the interviews was not to bring more people than necessary. Also, make sure that the people you do bring have a clear reason for being there. Of course, that’s not always possible, because there is definite value in bringing people just in case a specialized topic comes up, but in that case it’s a good idea to explain that up front.
Make it a true team presentation; don’t have one person do 90% of the talking.
If you bring in one of your own senior level people, you have the delicate task of convincing that person to hold his or her ego in check. What does that mean? Make sure they know their role in the presentation and don’t free-lance. Don’t let them go on too long. Coach them to ensure that they deflect most questions to you; otherwise they will undercut your own authority and accountability and the client will be confused about whom to turn to when they have an issue.
It’s also possible to err on the other side, and expect the senior person to carry too much of the load. One senior executive complained to me that his account managers seem to think that he can work some sort of magic just because of his rank. If it’s your account, it’s up to you to manage the process, set expectations, and use your senior management properly, as you would any other asset.
Most importantly, make sure you and they are on the same page. An IT VP at a large technology firm told me about a presentation involving a professional services outsourcing firm. During the sales process, he had asked the account manager if his company would agree to letting his company hire any of its employees that they were impressed with, something that most of these firms avoid. The account manager said that, absolutely they could do that; in fact, that was a strategic direction they were considering. When the company’s C-Level executive flew in for a meeting, that was the second question the VP asked. The response he got from the executive was, “Hell, no. Why would we do that?”
Get agreement on the agenda and who will handle each part, ensuring a proper balance of talk time.
Transitions are important to maintain a smooth flow and keep people engaged in the forward progress of the meeting.
The person handing off should tee up the next presenter by giving a brief explanation of how their topic follows. For example, you could say,
“You have very ambitious goals for your business in the next couple of years. Effective execution of your key business processes is going to be critical, and our next topic will address how we are enabling some industry-leading applications…”
After a speaker has finished, it’s a nice practice to do a brief summary of what they said and tie it into the principal theme of the meeting.
During their turn, each speaker should include links and references to what other speakers have said or are about to say.
Stay on top of the time. It helps to have one person designated to keep a close eye on time and have subtle signals arranged if things are going off track, such as an unobtrusive tap on the watch or the wrist.
It’s a good idea to ensure that presentations are not designed to fill every minute they have available on the agenda. Since it’s your goal to have a dialogue, there has to be enough time built in to allow for questions and necessary digressions. Sometimes digressions from prepared material are welcome, especially when ideas come up that point to potential customer needs.
Adjusting: No plan ever goes off exactly as laid out on paper. You need to be prepared to adjust the agenda based on what the customer says and how they react to various topics. Presenters must be prepared to cut back on their presentation time, for example, or to step up and speak extemporaneously on an unexpected topic.
What to do when you’re not presenting: One of the easiest traps to fall into in a team presentation is for people who are not speaking to pay as close attention to the current speaker as if they are hearing it for the first time. Even though you’ve heard it many times before, if you tune out, others will. Other audience members will take cues from you, so act interested. In his book, Perfect Pitch, Jon Steel tells how his firm won a large contract because, as the client told him, “Each of you seemed to enjoy what your colleagues were saying as much as I did.” The competitor’s presenters, on the other hand, were studying their notes for their next part and even rolling their eyes at some parts.
Of course, another practical reason to pay attention is that a question might come up during the presentation that the speaker will send your way to answer. If your mind is wandering, it can feel like you’re on an awfully lonely island when you have to ask your customer to repeat the question.
In
The first thing to remember is that you are planning a team presentation, not a group presentation. Any collection of individuals can form a group at a moment’s notice, but it takes time and care to mold a team. They call it teamwork for a reason. That’s why there is a big difference between a group presentation and a team presentation.
A group presentation is a series of individual presentations that might or might not have a strong connection with each other. Each one could probably stand on its own. A team presentation, by contrast, is a single presentation with several participants. This is a critical difference, because it changes how you plan it, practice it, and deliver it.
Because a team presentation is a single presentation, there is one plan for the presentation, and one person is in charge. As the USA Olympic basketball team has demonstrated on occasion, even a Dream Team of superstars is going to lose if you just have a collection of individuals trying to do their own thing. People have to keep their egos under control and see their part as a contribution to the big picture.
It does not mean that one person writes the entire presentation for all the participants. They can still craft their own individual parts, just as long as they do it within the agreed-on architecture. Their specialized knowledge only makes sense within the big picture, and that is what the account manager brings to the table.
The good news is that most of the process that you use to prepare an individual presentation is exactly what you need for a team presentation. Because it’s a single presentation, the same principles apply. The additional complexity comes from meshing the individual contributions into a seamless whole.
Who does the planning? That’s up to the sales team. The Account Manager could decide on the overall structure and then ask participants to build their presentation to fit. However, best practice is to have the team come together for at least an initial planning meeting. This brings several benefits:
First, as the old saying goes, “none of us is as smart as all of us.” The combined input should result in a better presentation, especially as some team members may have specific information not known to the whole group.
Second, when everyone knows what everyone else is going to say, it helps them build references and links to other parts of the presentation. It also avoids the potential trap of having someone contradict a teammate.
Third, it provides a greater sense of ownership. Team camaraderie of the sort alluded to earlier in this section can’t be faked or just turned on for the presentation.
A team presentation is just an individual one on steroids
Everything you have to do for an individual presentation applies to team presentations, but the addition of others adds another level of preparation. Let’s review the required steps for a successful strategic sales presentation, and see what adjustments must be made for a team presentation.
Analysis: One of the benefits of a team sale is the diversity of connections, perspectives and information that each team member has. The challenge is to get all that information out on the table so that the team has the information needed for effective analysis. The important task here is to connect the dots between the various collections of information that each team member has.
During the planning phase, the presentation team should have a common document so that all members of the team can see it. Besides the obvious benefit of “being on the same page”, this process can often spark new ideas as knowledge is brought into the open and combined.
Shaping the conditions: The entire sales team should be working from a single opportunity planning template or document which details the buyer’s decision making process, with the relationships and influences clearly mapped out and understood by the entire team.
Core message: One of the most important reasons to have one clear theme in an individual presentation is to keep your presentation from being rambling and unfocused. Imagine how much more important that is with several people being involved.
It’s absolutely critical to have the discipline of one message that everyone supports and sticks to during their portion of the presentation. Buyers will get confused if they can’t connect all the threads, and even more so if presenters appear to contradict each other.
The reliance on a single clear theme was probably the most common denominator among the top team presenters interviewed for my book. One company called it the Central Question, another called it the Win Message, but nearly all insisted that this is the critical first step in all their team presentations.
Military planners use the concept of commander’s intent to ensure that subordinates can respond to the unexpected while still furthering the purposes of the operation. In team presentations, the one clear theme serves the same purpose. Because the presentation will never go exactly as it’s drawn up during the planning, it’s all the more important to ensure that when things go off track, the person speaking at the time can adjust and adapt, within the boundaries of the original intent.
Structure of the presentation: The main points that support the theme remain the same; the only difference is that each main point may actually be the complete presentation for individual team members. By having a clear structure, individual presenters see their piece as a part of the whole presentation. That main point then becomes their core message for their own specific piece, and the process is taken from there. This way, when the pieces are put back together, everything works the way it’s supposed to, as a seamless whole. It’s like the way Boeing built the 787, with different contractors working on a major assembly such as the wings and tail, working to exacting specifications so that when it was all bolted together the thing would actually fly.
It’s also important that each individual piece include references to previous and upcoming speakers, such as “As Chris mentioned, one of the root causes of the problem is the fluctuation in density from one batch to the next, and our solution addresses that by…”
Evidence: The supporting evidence portion is put together individually, and then brought back to the team. It’s not up to the team to parse the evidence, because the person putting it together is the recognized subject matter expert. However, it’s useful to have the team review what will be said to reduce redundancy or avoid contradiction.
Introduction and close: The team leader is probably going to be the person delivering the introduction. Besides the standard ingredients of an individual presentation, the team leader should also introduce the individual presenters and briefly explain their roles. The emphasis here is on brevity, because he or she will want to say a little more about each person just before handing off to them for their part.
The team leader may also take over for the close, or leave it to the last speaker to tie everything together. Since team presentations may be longer than individual ones, a brief summary at the end is a good idea.
Visuals: The only difference on visuals is just to ensure that the entire deck, if one is being used, should have a common look and feel. It should look like one presentation, not a patchwork.