fbpx

Practical Eloquence Blog

Podcasts

Lean Communication: What Is It and Why Do You Need It?

More value, less waste is the mantra and fundamental goal of the lean manufacturing movement, which has produced tremendous increases in quality and productivity since it began to be introduced in the second half of the last century.

If you are hearing this, you are almost certainly a knowledge worker, which means that your success is directly tied to your ability to take in, process, and communicate information in a fashion that is useful to others.

In a world where we can transmit huge volumes of information instantly, talk to people around the globe simultaneously, share screens, and exchange clips of cute cats with childhood chums, communication is easier, faster and more plentiful than ever before.

But when talk is so cheap, fast and ubiquitous, useful and meaningful communication is at the same time harder than it’s ever been. That’s because the very ease of creating and transmitting it means that useless information is churned out much faster than ever, and it becomes much tougher to get exactly what you need to make good decisions or take the right action. In economics, Gresham’s Law states that bad money drives out good, and I’m convinced that the same dynamic applies to communication.

Remember the old story of the young boy who received a pile of horse manure, and dove in excitedly because he knew there was a pony in there somewhere? Like that boy, I am an optimist: I do believe the pony is in there, but it’s getting harder and harder to find because the mountain of crap just keeps getting higher.

The solution is lean communication, which is all about producing more value with less waste.

The Economics of Lean Communication

In a free market, companies create profits by creating value that others are willing to pay for, in excess of their costs of production. If they want to generate more profits, they must either increase the value or reduce their costs, and this focus on the bottom-line forces a customer-centered discipline. Before introducing a new product, they have to think carefully about whether customers will buy it, and whether they can produce it profitably.

When their customers consider whether to buy their products, they measure the value they receive in terms of ROI, which simply is a division problem, with Return on top and Investment on the bottom. While there is always a lot of gray area in deciding what results and costs to include in the calculation, it’s still a reasonably straightforward way of prioritizing how to invest their limited capital.

We all take this for granted when it comes to business, but is it possible that we forget it when we communicate? Just as companies don’t pump out products unless they think they’ll sell, we should not just pump out words without thinking about whether they are worth listening to. Will listeners be willing to pay the price in time and effort to hear what you have to say?

It may seem like a no-brainer, but if you’ve ever sat through an interminable and unproductive meeting, and calculated the total opportunity cost of everyone in that room, if you’ve had to wade through hundreds of emails to glean actionable information, if you’ve worked hard to decode what someone is really saying, if you’ve had to tolerate a chatty co-worker when you’re in a hurry, you know how rarely people think about communication in this way.

In a world where it is so easy to communicate instantly and electronically, it would seem that talk is cheaper than ever. But the real cost is the hidden opportunity cost: what is the combined value of the time that is used by speaker and audience, including all the process steps from composing the thoughts, writing/speaking, transmitting and discussing?

Return on Time and Effort

It’s much more slippery to pin down the return on communication, but we can at least try to measure the unmeasurable by applying the same thought process as ROI. I call it RoTE, or Return on Time and Effort.

Return: What value does your audience receive from listening to you? We measure value in lean communication in terms of outcomes and results. When the information shared improves a decision or leads to effective action that generates measurable outcomes, you could theoretically put an actual dollar value on that conversation or presentation. Of course, that’s tough to measure, but still, it’s one of those things that people know when they see it or hear it. It’s also important to note that value is defined by the listener, not the speaker.

Practically and mathematically, R is the most important factor in the equation. If it’s zero or negative, no amount of brevity or clarity will make the communication worthwhile, and if it’s high enough, almost any amount of time and effort will be worth devoting to it.

That said, it’s still important to concentrate on the denominator of the equation. Unlike ROI, in which the investment is only calculated in dollars, communication requires the investment of two costly currencies: attention and cognitive effort.

Time is of course the most easily measurable factor. How much time do you take in getting your message across? Do you get right to the point, or do you overload your listeners with information they already know, do you hold back vital information out of fear of offending, do you have trouble resisting interesting but irrelevant snippets and trivia?

The paradox of brevity is that it takes time to produce. When Mark Twain received this telegram from a publisher:

NEED 2-PAGE SHORT STORY TWO DAYS

He sent back this reply:

NO CAN DO 2 PAGES TWO DAYS. CAN DO 30 PAGES 2 DAYS. NEED 30 DAYS TO DO 2 PAGES

So, there is a cost/benefit analysis you have to run through your mind: is there any net value added when you invest your time to save time for the listener? The answer is almost always yes, first because when you are presenting to audiences of more than one person, it’s easy to see that an extra hour of preparation to shorten your presentation can pay off in multiples, especially when you are presenting to higher-level people whose opportunity cost of listening can quickly add up to big numbers. Second, the thinking you put into effort of making things brief carries over to the next part of the equation, effort.

Effort is harder to measure but no less important than time. The simple truth is that thinking is hard work, and we generally avoid doing any more than is absolutely necessary. As with brevity, you work hard so they don’t have to. The harder you make people work to understand what you’re saying, the more of their time you take and the less value you add to them.

Building equity

When companies create profits, they build equity which strengthens their balance sheets and provides resources to generate future profits. It’s the same way with personal communication. As you build a reputation for delivering good value through lean communication, you are building personal equity in the form of credibility.

Credibility can lead to the Matthew Effect, the idea that the rich get richer. By consistently delivering a Return, at low cost in time and effort, you will generate greater trust, with more decision makers who will require less verification of your arguments and facts, and accordingly save time over the long run—for yourself and for others. That is priceless, whether you can put a dollar value on it or not.

In the next podcast, I’m going to walk you through the ABCs of Lean Communication: How to Add value, Briefly and Clearly.

Read More
Leadership Communication

Book Recommendation: Leadership in Turbulent Times

How the hell did they do it?

Guys like Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt, I mean. These poor guys did not have the opportunities to learn about leadership that we have today—no business schools to learn all the latest research about leadership, no Amazon to ship them the latest leadership tome, and certainly no blogs dispensing daily wisdom. It boggles the mind that they could even function as leaders without the resources we have today.

Yet somehow they managed to do OK. In fact, when you compare them to the political pygmies who populate Washington today, you might say they did better than OK. If you would like to learn how, I strongly recommend Doris Kearns Goodwin’s book: Leadership in Turbulent Times.

Goodwin examines the lives of four American presidents: Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, and Lyndon Johnson. The first three were unquestionably great presidents, and the fourth at least achieved great things for civil rights in America.

She divides the book into three sections, and they read like the acts in a play.

The first section is called “Ambition and the Recognition of Leadership”, and it takes us through the early years up through their twenties, each in a separate chapter, covering their motivations and aspirations, as well as the soil conditions where their budding leadership skills took root. What’s obvious is that leaders—at least the great ones—are both born and made. None of the four had “natural” leadership competencies; they all made mistakes and they all developed their skills through thousands of hours of study, speaking, and interactions with thousands of people. But the only reason they put in those hours, was that each was gifted with extraordinary ambition and drive, and that’s something no one can teach you. If your father told you education was a “doubly wasted” because it cost money and kept you from work, and pulled you out of school at age nine, would you walk for miles after work to borrow books and then read them at night by the light of a fire, as Lincoln did?

The second section, “Adversity and Growth”, is about the introduction of conflict and crisis, of heartache and challenge that could have easily crushed the spirit of each. One wonders if any of the four would have been the leaders they became if they had not each undergone their personal ordeals. How would Theodore Roosevelt’s personal approach to life have developed if he had not suffered the unfathomable tragedy of his mother and his young wife both dying on the same day, and had not gone west to live and work on his Dakota ranch? Would FDR, born to a life of luxury, have had the compassion for the less fortunate if he had not been paralyzed by polio? Maybe, maybe not—there’s no way to prove it one way or the other. But what is useful and even inspirational to know is that, if you go through a personal crisis of your own, you might be able to take heart and know that it’s just possible that you can come through on the other side as a better person for it.

The third section, “The Leader and the Times: How They Led”, recognizes that there is no single flavor of leadership that applies in every circumstance. Goodwin examines four types, transformational leadership, crisis management, turnaround leadership, and visionary leadership, using a case study for each. Some of the “lessons” feel a bit bolted-on, as if an MBA graduate student helped her translate historical lessons to appeal to a wider business audience, but that’s a minor quibble. (In fact, I probably wouldn’t have written this post if it didn’t have an appeal to a wider business audience.)

But I don’t recommend you read the book for its specific “lessons”. Yes, they’re useful in a bullet point sort of way, kind of like lists of things that great leaders should do. But the problem with lists is that they generally dispense generic advice that everybody already knows anyway. Read it instead to soak up the ethos of leadership: the character development that prepares a person to rise to the unprecedented challenges ahead of them.

When times are turbulent and your organization or team most needs a steady hand, it’s not going to be the formulas that you learned in business school that will get you through. It’s the strength that is forged in the crucible of personal crisis, the compassion developed by thousands of individual personal encounters with real people, and the clarity of purpose that comes from long hours of introspection and careful thought about who you are as a person and as a leader. And one of the best ways to think productively about leadership is to read this book.

I began by asking how people learned about leadership in days gone by. They studied the leaders who had gone before them. Lincoln revered and studied Washington, and was in turn revered by Theodore. Franklin consciously modeled his own career on that of his cousin, and in turn mentored LBJ. You don’t have to stop reading all that other stuff that we have today, but there is a lot to be gained by studying great historical figures, and Leadership in Turbulent Times is a n excellent place to start.

Read More
Productivity

Quantity Is the Path to Quality

One of the funniest writers I’ve read is Tim Dorsey, who writes novels about the only-in-Florida escapades of a lovable serial killer named Serge Storms. Yeah, you read that right; it takes a special ability to be able write something hilarious about murder and violence and depravity, but Dorsey does it beautifully, and has kept it up for 21 Serge books so far.

I mention Dorsey to make the point about creativity, and the amazing ability that some people seem to have to consistently produce high quality work. I once attended a book-signing he did here in town, and I told him that I only showed up to find out what kind of person thinks of these things.

I didn’t get an answer to my question that day, and I still wonder about it, but I also know that my question was a bit misguided. It was misguided because it assumed that creativity is a trait, one that you’re either born with, or not. By the same token, humor seems to be a trait, or the ability to deliver an inspirational speech, or so many other activities that the really good people seem to be able to magically produce. Or are they actually skills?

I don’t pretend to know the exact answer, and despite all the studies psychologists have done, I’m not sure anyone knows. It’s a little bit of the old nature v nurture or talent v deliberate practice debate. But I do believe that each of these creative activities depends on some mixture of both, and skill is no small proportion. So, no matter how much of the good stuff you’re blessed with at birth, it also depends on a lot of repetitions to produce good quality stuff.

But don’t just take my word for it. In his book, Hook ‘Em with Humor, Ricky Olson says that you have to produce a lot of jokes to find a few that are any good. Double-Nobelist Linus Pauling said: “The best way to get a good idea is to get a lot of ideas.” Lincoln and Churchill and King delivered thousands of speeches for many years before they produced the works we remember them for. As Kurt Vonnegut said, writing is “a lot like inflating a blimp with a bicycle pump. All it takes is time.” They all knew that quantity is the path to quality.

Let’s come down a few notches to ordinary individuals like you and me. In my own work, I’ve learned that you have to churn out a lot of stuff—a lot of it bad, at least at first—before you start getting better at anything. Like when I started podcasting earlier this year; I thought it would be so easy. After all, I know the material, I know how to talk, so how tough can it be? Well, my dozens of false starts and re-starts quickly showed me that wasn’t the case. I’m a lot better now…but not nearly as good as I know I can get.

But be smart about it

There’s no way to get around doing the work, but that does not mean you can’t be smart about it. Here are some suggestions:

Block off enough time. You need to go deep into your own mind to find the good stuff. When you first approach a topic, you’re going to produce the usual stale connections. That’s because “neurons that fire together wire together”, as Donald Hebb said, so you have to break through that stale crust to find new connections within your own brain, and there’s no quick way past it. For myself, I find that it takes at least a half hour of undistracted work to get into that zone.

Carry a journal. When you think deeply about something and then leave it to do something else, your subconscious still keeps working on it, so new ideas will pop up at the most random times. If you don’t write it down, it will sink back to the bottom of your mind, possibly never to be thought of again. Or if a story or quote or factoid catches your attention and you can’t think of how to use it at the time, wrap it carefully in the written word and store it away in your mental basket; it will be there when you need it.

Get feedback. If you can afford a good coach, that’s the best, because a coach has been over that territory before and can suggest shortcuts on the path to quality. But even if you don’t have a coach, the best way to get feedback is to try out your ideas with others. Find every opportunity you can to speak; or share your thoughts in a blog; or talk about your ideas with your peers. Don’t wait until it’s perfect, or it may never come out.

Remind yourself that it gets easier with time. The great thing about creativity is that it’s a self-reinforcing phenomenon. The more ideas you generate, the faster the new ideas come. Just in the mere act of writing this post, for example, I’ve already jotted down two new ideas for subsequent articles.

But you DO have to get started. If the path to quality is quantity, the sooner you get on the path, the better. The best way to be “creative” is to just start creating, and keep going.

Read More
Podcasts

Persuasive Humor Is Serious Business

Do you want to know how to make an instant connection to other people, while looking smart and confident and putting them in a good mood, all at the same time?

Sorry, I can’t help you. You’ve come to the wrong place.

Just kidding. There actually is a magic substance that can do all those things for you, but it’s tricky to work with and can blow up in your face if you mess up. By now you already know that I’m talking about: humor.

I still remember a loan committee meeting over 30 years ago when Scott, a loan officer, was talking about a borrower with a difficult sounding name, and our President said, “European?” Scott looked confused for a second, and then said, “Oh, I thought you were going to tell me European in the wind if you think you’re going to get this loan approved.”

Some of you reading this may have just laughed out loud. Some of you may have had to re-read it because you didn’t get the joke at first. (Hint: say it out loud). Some of you didn’t think it was funny, and some of you may have even been offended, and I’ve possibly lost you as a reader.

That little  story points out the power and peril of using humor in a business environment. Humor can be an enormously effective and useful tool in business communication, but it can also be slippery and hard to handle. It can help you connect with an audience or turn them against you in an instant.

Why does humor work so well?

Humor can be an enormously powerful tool in persuasive business communication. Let’s look at some of the benefits you can get if when it works.

It gets everyone’s attention. The essence of humor is surprise, and surprise always compels attention. Our brains are exquisitely tuned to anything that breaks a pattern or an expectation, and that’s exactly what a joke or quip can do. Also, everyone listen because no one wants to be left out of the joke.

It can level the playing field. As I recall that meeting, Scott was a junior loan officer who was making his first presentation to the high ranking people in the room. The status gulf was pretty wide, but he closed it instantly by getting everyone to laugh and appreciate his wit. They saw him as a likeable person and were more disposed to listen to what he had to say. By getting everyone to share in a common emotion, you’ve brought the group together, with yourself as the center and the catalyst. As Victor Borge said, “Laughter is the shortest distance between two people.”

It can help something stick in memory. The fact that that story popped into my mind as I was thinking about writing this article attests to that. Even thirty years later, I still remember it and chuckle about it. When Abraham Lincoln was first running for office in rural Illinois, he told lots of humorous stories, and people would remember and repeat them long after he moved to the next town, and that is what got him elected. By the way, Lincoln one time when a heckler yelled out that Lincoln was two-faced, he said, “If I had two faces would I wear this one?”

Humor can defuse tension. When people are angry or tense, humor can be a relief valve. Bank manager’s desk story…

It can disarm a skeptical and even hostile audience. Humor is a great way to open someone’s mind enough to slip in a serious point. When people are in a good mood, their minds are going to be more open and receptive to what you have to say. When liberal Ted Kennedy was invited to speak at a fundamentalist school, he opened with: “Actually, a number of people in Washington were surprised that I was invited to speak here—and even more surprised when I accepted the invitation. They seem to think that it’s easier for a camel to pass through the eye of the needle than for a Kennedy to come to the campus of Liberty Baptist College.”

It can defuse a potential weakness. When Ronald Reagan debated Walter Mondale in 1984, he knew Mondale was going to make an issue out of his age, so he said “I want you to know that also I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience.” When he said that, even Mondale had to laugh, and he knew he was beaten.

It can make you look smart. We all admire someone whose quick wit lets them rise to the occasion when the pressure’s on. But it goes deeper than that. Think about it: when you say something that makes people laugh, it’s because you’ve thought of something they haven’t.

It makes you look confident. It takes confidence to poke fun at yourself and having the guts to expose the humor in an otherwise serious situation. Besides, just because telling a joke can be risky, others may admire your gut to try to pull it off.

Humor is a great way to create contrast in your presentation. You can lighten up when things get too serious, or get people laughing and then quickly switch gears to something serious when you have their attention.

But wait, it can be risky

Using humor is kind of like throwing a forward pass in football. Three things can happen, and two of them are bad. Your joke may fall flat, or it may actually hurt you.

Let’s take a look at the potential downsides, in descending order of seriousness.

It can get you fired. I don’t need  to spend too  much time on this here. We all know how sensitive our times have become, and anything you say even in private can quickly become viral global news.

It can insult someone. Leaving aside the ethical considerations of hurting someone, you can easily lose the goodwill of the target and potentially lose the whole audience by appearing mean-spirited.

You’ve made yourself  look awkward, nervous, or simply trying too hard. We’re often advised to start a presentation with a joke to break the ice, but that’s become so common that people may see right through it and think less of you.

You’ve made yourself  look like a non-serious person. If you’re speaking with a high-ranking audience, their time is valuable and the first thirty seconds or so can be crucial; you may waste it by taking a cheap shot.

How to use humor without hurting yourself

Considering the balance of reward and risk, let’s first set out to do no harm, and then figure out how to use it to positive effect.

If you’re planning ahead to use humor in your presentation, make sure it’s appropriate. It doesn’t have to be G-rated for an adult audience, but maybe you should make it PG. By that I don’t mean parental guidance—use peer guidance: try it out on your peers and get their impression. And if you’re in doubt, leave it out.

Respect the occasion or the topic. While humor is a welcome guest at almost any occasion. Sometimes it can trivialize or demean the situation.

Make sure it’s relevant. We’ve seen how a clever remark can stick in someone’s memory, but if it’s not connected to your message people will remember the joke but not the point you were hoping to make.

Know your limitations, both in general and also about specific forms of humor. I’m not especially good at telling long-form jokes, the kind that involves a story and a punch line at the end. Most people take too long to tell the story and mess up the timing of the punch line, which is why professional comedians practice endlessly before they bring out a joke in public.

Singe but don’t burn. Humor can be a great way to score points against opposing arguments, but if you use it, beware of being mean. It can turn the audience against you in a microsecond and turn you into the bad guy.

If you want to make fun of someone, let it be yourself. Self-deprecating humor is especially useful in two totally different situations. If you’re higher-ranking than your listeners, you can use it to make yourself seem more human and humble. On the other side, if you have a weakness or limitation that makes your listeners skeptical about you, you can preempt it by joking about it.

Humor is most effective when it complements your message without calling too much attention to itself. If you say something funny and it works, great—go with the flow. Don’t make a big deal out of it or call attention to yourself and how clever you are. If some people don’t get it, don’t try to call attention to it or try to explain it. If your joke or quip falls flat, it’s only awkward if you dwell on it; either cut your losses and simply move on, or make a self-deprecating joke about your feeble attempt and then move on.

Can you develop your humor?

There are some professionals who say that humor is actually a skill that you can learn and improve. I believe them, but even they warn you that it’s not easy. It takes a lot of thought, time and practice to develop the skill, so you have to decide whether it’s the best use of your time. Those stand-up comedians we admire who make it look so easy have actually spent thousands of hours perfecting their craft.

Most people don’t have the time or the motivation to work hard at it, but the good news is you don’t have to. My own advice is really the same thing I would say about any other rhetorical device: if you know your thinking is sound and your message is strong, then you can add it as additional spice; just don’t be afraid to be loosen up and have a little fun with it.

Read More
1 25 26 27 28 29 197