fbpx

Practical Eloquence Blog

Persuasive communication - Podcasts

How to Gain Trust Quickly

Although common “wisdom” says it takes a long time to establish trust, the reality—as proven by scientists, law enforcement professionals and even con artists—is that we all make nearly instantaneous judgments about whether to trust people, and only afterwards refine or revise our initial impression.

While it’s not possible to predetermine how others will react to you, in this podcasts, I share three principles, two actions and two behaviors that will make you more immediately trustworthy in the eyes of others.

Principles:

Intentions trump technique

Charles Green, co-author of The Trusted Advisor Fieldbook, calls this principles over processes, and it’s one of the five attitudes he suggests you must have to create trusting relationships.

It all begins with intent. While it is possible for someone to fake it, people generally can see through you fairly quickly. Plus, it’s a lot easier and more natural to do some of the behaviors I’m going to suggest when you actually feel them yourself. It’s the same principle underlying method acting, in which the actor is taught to think of some situation in their life when they felt the emotion they are meant to portray. When they “become” the character they are portraying they find it much easier to do it.

Of course, there are people who know how to fake their intentions very well for their own ends, such as psychopaths and con artists, but that’s not really an option for normal, good-hearted people such as you and me.

There’s a bit of a paradox here, because of course one of the reasons you want someone to trust you is because you probably want something from them in return. It may be a sale if it’s a customer, or agreement if it’s a peer or a boss. But as I’ve said before, the best way to get what you want is to give others what they want by granting it to you.

Suspend your ego

Probably the most important and at the same time the hardest principle to follow. This one comes from Robin Dreeke, former FBI counterintelligence agent and author of The Code of Trust. It’s another way of saying what I’ve harped on constantly throughout my podcasts: outside-in thinking—make it about them, not you.

What does this mean in practical terms? First, try to see things from their perspective. That’s hard to do, especially when they say something you don’t agree with. Your natural temptation is to argue, but what you must do here is ask questions or seek to understand. Talk less than you normally do. Don’t try to be interesting; be interested in them. Be curious about them. Resist the temptation to tell your story. Most people love to talk about their kids, for example, but aren’t quite so enthusiastic to hear about others’ kids. Get interested in their kids.

Start with trust

It’s unrealistic to expect someone to do something you wouldn’t do yourself, and that is just as important for trust as anything else. If you want others to trust you, you have to be prepared to trust them, and to show them. “Bare your neck” One way to quickly do this is to show your own vulnerability, either by confessing a weakness or by asking for advice. Reciprocity is a powerful tool of influence, and people who have been granted a trust may be more open to granting one in return.

Actions

Earn the right

Study them. Learn as much as you can about them: their background, their education, their interests, things they have said or written, etc. People will be flattered that you did it, and it will give you material you can use to establish common ground and to ask better questions that get them engaged in the conversation.

Establish common ground

Similarity is one of the fastest shortcuts to trust. As Maria Konnikova says, “We are more trusting of people who seem more familiar and more similar to us, and we open up to them in ways we don’t to strangers: those like us and those we know or recognize are unlikely to want to hurt us.”

Behaviors

Be transparent

Good intentions are useless unless people can see them, so this is about body language and verbal language. Nonverbal is first because people see it before the first words come out of your mouth. Be forthright and friendly in your approach and your gaze, Have a firm handshake; above all, smile genuinely, and act as if they are the highlight of your day. Face them squarely as if you have nothing to hide.

Listen as if your life depends on it

This is so obvious that it’s almost a cliché, but I want to stress the idea of patient listening. In other words, don’t just listen for an opportunity to insert your own opinion or to begin your pitch. Make them feel as if they are the most important person in the room at that time. When they say something, ask questions about it: find out more about what they mean, why they said it, how strongly they feel about it, maybe get them to tell a story about how they came to feel that way.

Sources referenced in this podcast:

The Trusted Advisor Fieldbook, by Charles Green and Andrea Howe

The Code of Trust, by Robin Dreeke

The Confidence Game: Why We Fall for It…Every Time , by Maria Konnikova

Looks Matter More than Reputation When It Comes to Trusting People with Our Money

Read More
Uncategorized

Why You Should Keep Making New Year’s Resolutions Despite (Almost) Never Keeping Them

If insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results, then making New Year’s resolutions seems to be pretty crazy. And when you consider the irrationality of letting a random date on the calendar have so much influence on your behavior, it gets even more insane.

Yet most of us still do it. We enter every year determined to make a fresh start, whether it’s finally breaking a bad habit, firmly establishing a healthy and productive one, or tackling a long-dreamt project. In my own case, I love to view January 1 as a blank page on which I feel I can write any story I wish, and I have the confidence that this time it will be different.

Because I’m self-employed, I’m in control of my daily schedule while I am not traveling to work with clients, so most of my resolutions center around productive work habits, such as scheduling blocks of time for writing or prospecting, or reducing distractions such as social media.

I can’t speak for others, but I’m probably typical: I have never had a year where I stuck faithfully to every resolution I made. On some rare occasions I actually see a lasting change in my habits, but mostly I stick with a few for more than a month or two, and the great majority are only embarrassing memories after just a few short days.

And I fully expect the same thing will happen with the resolutions I’ve made this year—but I still have made some ambitious resolutions and plans and next year I will do it again.

Why?

Because while hope is not a strategy, it is still a precious asset to have. Trying is better than not trying. I don’t want to be one of those sad people who have given up hope of getting better, or who have let the pressures of everyday living overwhelm their vision of what is personally possible. I know a bunch of these folks, and I refuse to be like them.

I also do it because it does work. According to one study, people who make resolutions are almost twelve times as likely to be successful after six months than non-resolvers. And I’ve seen it in my own life. Just last year I resolved to start a podcast, and I produced 44 episodes during 2018. The three books I’ve written have all been conceived as part of a resolution for the relevant year. (And I resolve to write one more this year.)

I do it because it’s always healthy to take stock of who you are, where you are, and compare it to who and where you want to be. Because you can’t embrace the chase without having something distant and worthwhile to pursue. Because each small win and each additional day sticking to the resolution can be so personally satisfying.

So, call me crazy if you will, but I am making fresh resolutions again this year—and this time I expect different results!

Read More
Clear thinking - Podcasts - Uncategorized

Dare to Disagree – But Be Smart About It

“If we are all in agreement on the decision – then I propose we postpone further discussion of this matter until our next meeting to give ourselves time to develop disagreement and perhaps gain some understanding of what the decision is all about.” Alfred P. Sloan


In recent podcasts, I’ve stressed the value of going along with your conversational partner in order to achieve an agreeable, smooth flow. But in this podcast, I am going to take the opposite side of that argument—to disagree with myself, essentially.

That’s because disagreements are not only inevitable but can be extremely valuable to produce best thinking and results. Unfortunately, most people are uncomfortable with it. As Margaret Heffernan says, 85% of executives admitted that they had issues at work that they were afraid to raise.

So, there are clearly advantages to daring to disagree—but you can also be smart about it. In this podcasts I explain the risks of being too agreeable, the benefits of challenging others’ thinking, and some approaches to use to ensure that you can be constructive in your disagreement while preserving relationships as well.

Risks of the “accepting” approach

  • Taking a bad idea too far
  • Leaving important things unsaid
  • Focusing too much on “being nice” can distract from thinking about the issue
  • Lack of clarity

Benefits of constructive disagreement

  • More clarity and less risk of misunderstanding
  • Speaking up may encourage others to do the same
  • Great way to pressure-test your ideas and conviction
  • Encourage diversity of thought

How to engage in constructive disagreement

  • Don’t make it personal
  • Keep the big picture in mind
  • Have an open mind and be open to persuasion
  • Use your imagination to find a third way that satisfies both parties

In the end, honest disagreement can be one of the highest signs of respect that you can offer to someone, because it treats them as an intelligent person who is willing to listen to reason and cares for a greater good than pure self-interest.

If you disagree with anything Isay in this podcast, please pay me the respect of letting me know.

See also: When Is It Your Duty to Disagree?

Read More
Expression - Podcasts

Creative Conversations

Today’s topic is creative conversations. Have you ever had a conversation with someone that just clicked? But more than that, the clicking produced a solution to a problem or a creative idea?

Today’s topic is actually a bit out of sync with the premise of Practical Eloquence, because it’s not about persuasive conversations. Persuasion is wonderful, of course, but today I want to go beyond it to talk about creation—creation of new ideas, new solutions to a problem, through a meeting of two or more minds.

Think of a creative dialogues as assisted thinking; your goal is not to win, or to impress someone, or even to persuade, but to work together to produce a positive result.

There’s a story in Stan McChrystal’s new book, Leaders: Myth and Reality, that’s a great example of what I’m talking about. In 1905 there was a young bureaucrat wrestling with a difficult problem, and he decided to talk it out with his good friend.  As he wrote later,

“I started the conversation with him in the following way: ‘Recently I have been working on a difficult problem. Today I came to do battle against that problem with you.’ We discussed every aspect of this problem. Then suddenly I understood where the key to this problem lay. Next day I came back to him again and said to him, without even saying hello, ‘Thank you. I’ve completely solved the problem.’ An analysis of the concept of time was my solution.”

You probably figured out by now that the young bureaucrat was Albert Einstein. Would he have figured out the problem without a creative conversation? Probably, but it was the conversation that provided the actual spark.

I love that phrase: “I came to do battle against that problem with you.” That’s the true essence of a creative conversation, one where both sides are united in a common goal or against a common problem. They’re not on opposite sides of an issue. The issue does not have two sides; it’s a circle with an infinite number of possible perspectives to view it from, and the conversational dance allows the freedom to view it from any perspective. There is no one right, and no one who has the full answer, but working together you achieve it.

In fact, the dia- in the word dialogue doesn’t mean two, it means through. And –logue means meaning. When you combine these two ideas you get “thinking together”.

A creative conversation is one that results in new ideas, and new action. A creative conversation is, stimulating, cumulative, synergistic, and catalytic.

Stimulating

A conversation that stimulates your thinking, one that stimulates new ideas, whether in your own mind or in the mind of the person you’re speaking with, or better still, in both minds at the same time. It’s a conversation where each side feels challenged mentally but not personally;

Cumulative

They build toward something, with each contribution supporting a general direction, even if you don’t know in advance what that direction is. Many conversations are aimless because when someone says something, the other person either negates it or neutralizes it.

Synergistic

I hate to use buzzwords, but these are synergistic conversations, because something emerges that is greater than the sum of individual contributions. It’s like each side has some pieces of the puzzle, but the conversation itself actually creates other missing pieces that were not there to begin with, and never would have come out except for the interplay of meaning between both minds… Where both sides learn something,

Catalytic

These conversations are also catalytic, because they can spur action and movement. How many times have you had a half-baked urge in your mind that only became a firm resolution to act because you had a chance to “bounce it off” someone else? Perhaps they asked the question that gave you the clarity to act, or encouragement, or a suggestion you had not thought of before?

What do these conversations sound like and feel like?

Let me ask you a question: when two people dance, how do you figure out who won? Of course it’s a dumb question, because dancing is not about winning, and that’s exactly the metaphor that applies to this type of conversation, except that this form of dance is not choreographed in advance, but arises naturally through a sincere exchange of ideas and perspectives.

These types of conversations flow naturally, with very few pauses and no awkward silences. Where you’re almost finishing each other’s sentences—not in a start-stop interrupting way, but in a way that builds off of whatever the other just said, and they do the same with you. It’s a conversation where no one is keeping score, but in the end there is a balance of contribution that feels just right, as if each person (and by the way, it can be multiple people—not just two) got more out of the conversation than they put in.

It’s the type of conversation where you can easily be surprised—not only by what the other person says, but even by the words that come out of your own mouth…And just as a quick note to reinforce what I just said: there’s a common misperception that you can’t learn while you’re talking. BS. I do it all the time. A lot of times, I don’t know what I truly think until I express it out loud, and I don’t think I’m unique in this respect.

Finally, you feel challenged but in control at the same time. You get a sense of flow because you’re at the sweet spot between challenge and ability…

How do you have creative conversations?

I’m not sure it’s possible to force a creative conversation, although Einstein clearly had that intent in mind when he set up his talk with his friend. But you can at least set up the conditions so that they are more likely to happen, ensure that you have some necessary ingredients, and at the same time leave out some ingredients that can kill conversations.

Plan ahead. You need to have some intent or even an actual agenda for the conversation so that it doesn’t just wander off into any direction.

Be curious. Curiosity is all about what I’ve talked about before, about outside-in thinking.

Be prepared to be wrong. Or to put that sentiment more positively, be prepared to learn something, and don’t take it personally when the other perspective makes more sense than yours. This takes respect and the belief that you can learn from the other person, that their contribution is worthwhile and helpful.

Listen. This goes without saying, and if the conversation is really flowing, you certainly won’t need a reminder. But if it starts to go off track, take stock of your own listening posture and effort and adjust as necessary.

Say “yes, and”. You can use ideas from the world of comedy improv. In improv, one person opens with a statement, and the other person builds off of it. The statement is called an “offer” and the key rule is to use a technique called “yes, and…”. According to leadership consultant Elizabeth Doty, “Yes means agreeing with your partner’s premise, whatever it is; and means building on what he or she has offered.”

 

 

 

 

Read More
1 20 21 22 23 24 197