fbpx

Practical Eloquence Blog

Persuasive communication

The 2018 Word of the Year is TOXIC

I don’t know which is a sadder commentary, the fact that the Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year is “toxic”, or the fact that it’s no surprise at all to have read that in the paper this morning.

Oxford says it chooses the word that is “judged to reflect the ethos, mood, or preoccupation of that particular year”, and I’d have to reluctantly agree that they nailed it with their choice this year.

I have strong feelings about where the principal blame lies for this state of affairs, but I don’t do politics in this blog so I will keep those to myself. Besides, placing blame will do nothing to improve the situation.

Instead, I’d like to focus on where the solution is likely to be found. We won’t get the solution from our political “leaders”, who appear locked in to a downward spiral of competitive name-calling. We won’t get it from the media, because each round of fresh bile seems only to boost ratings and sell more papers. And, as far as moral leadership coming from established religions, I’ll leave that up to your individual conscience to decide.

In fact, individual conscience is the only thing I see that contains the hope of a solution. When there’s a leadership vacuum, it can only be filled from below: from the individual choices and behaviors of individuals like you and me. What can we do? We can’t solve all the world’s problems, but we can make a difference where we are, with what we have.

The first thing we can do is defensive; we can avoid getting sucked into the vortex of incivility. I have a Facebook “friend” who delights in sending me provocative political memes on an almost daily basis. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve almost taken his bait and responded in kind, but that’s not going to accomplish anything useful. I try to remind myself of the old saying: “Never wrestle with a pig; the pig enjoys it and you both get dirty.”

You also want to be as careful about what you put into your mind as you are about what you put into your mouth. I’ve also found it helpful to go on a “toxic cleanse”. As a news junkie, I wouldn’t find it realistic to quit cold turkey, but I’ve scaled back the amount of time I spend consuming news media, and I think it makes a difference.

On a positive and proactive note, I’d like to think that we could make a difference by confronting and calling out others when they’re being toxic, but realistically that’s not likely to work. At the very least, though, we can all do our part by modeling non-toxic conversation and behavior, by not taking disagreements personally, by speaking out against obvious examples of bullying or overbearing behavior, by making the effort to understand and find common ground, when we do get pulled into these types of conversations.

As recently as 2015 that the WOTY was the “Happy face with tears” emoji, so there’s no law of nature that says the ethos of a particular year inevitably has to be bad. These things tend to generate their own correction, and each one of us has the ability to give the pendulum a slight upward nudge, and let’s make next year’s WOTY a positive one!

Read More
Podcasts - Questioning skills - Sales

Ask Them to Tell You a Story

In the last two podcasts, we’ve seen how questions are one of the power tools of persuasive communication. There’s probably only one other tool that has the power to do so much to persuade, and that is a good story.

A good story grabs and keeps attention; a good story makes you credible; a good story packs a lot of meaning into a simple package; a good story engages the heart as well as the head; and a good story sticks in the memory. That’s why it’s always great to have a story or two to reinforce your message.

So, what if you could marry the two, kind of like combining chocolate and peanut butter? That’s what I talk about in today’s podcast, how to use questions to get them to tell you the story you want them to hear.

You do that by asking questions that get them to articulate a story for why they should change. When you think about it, every decision to change has a story behind it. People don’t change for the sake of change; they change because they’ve told themselves a story. They’ve seen a conflict in their current situation that requires resolution. They envision the plot in their minds: if I do this, that will happen, and hopefully it will be a happy ending. No story, no change.

So, where do questions come in? You can use questions to draw out the story of change, and you can use questions to shape the story they do tell. It has to be their story, but you may be able to nudge it along in the direction of the ending you would like to see.

There are various forms of this approach. Teachers use the Socratic method in, clinical psychologists use Motivational Interviewing , salespeople use SPIN, are all designed to get listeners to reach their own conclusion that they must follow the course of action you’re selling. The general principle they all have in common is that rather than trying to motivate people to act for your reasons it is far better to draw out their own motivations. They do this by uncovering gaps between their current situation and an ideal state, and eliciting enough pain and tension that they feel compelled to act to close that gap, ideally with your plan, product, or idea.

Where have we all seen this before? Pretty much every time we’ve been to a movie. Every movie plot is essentially a variation of one narrative arc: situation, conflict, resolution. Think about it: the movie opens with a description of the situation, where we get to know the players and begin relating to them personally. Next an element of conflict is introduced, because without conflict there would be no reason to watch. If it’s an action movie, our heroes are faced with some danger; if it’s a romantic comedy, they meet a potential mate, but something is acting to keep them apart. As the movie goes on, the conflict grows to the point of crisis, where it’s hard to imagine it getting worse and equally hard to see how they will get out of it. But ultimately there’s a satisfactory ending.

Just as stories require conflict to make them work, selling—whether it’s a product or an idea—requires a need, one that is compelling enough for someone to take the risk and expense of buying into your solution.

But here’s the problem: if you tell your story to push the need on the buyer, you’re only increasing resistance and distrust because we all have built-in mental filters and barriers that resist persuasive messages. Anyone who has a small child knows that the surest way to get a certain behavior is to forbid it.

The best way around these filters is to make it their story, not yours. People love their own stories, in which they face a conflict that requires a resolution for a happy ending. When they are telling their story, they are actively engaged in creating the reality they want to see rather than passively or actively resisting what you tell them. The trick is to get the buyer to tell you their story: They are the heroes, they tell you their conflict, they feel their own pain, and they get excited about the potential happy ending, which just happens to be your solution.

How do you get them to tell the story? First, you establish the situation by asking questions about where they are today and where they expect or hope to go from here: how are they currently doing things, what are their goals and expectations for the future, what’s important to them personally? While you want to be reasonably open-ended with your questions to allow for learning something new, you can frame the conversation in the direction you want to go by choosing the topic to ask about.

What’s happening in this phase of the story? You’re learning, they’re opening up to you, and you’re steering the conversation in the direction you want.

You have to resist the temptation to jump straight to conflicts, because it may be too early. If you ask them about what problems they have before they are ready to talk about them, they can easily get defensive and close up. Most people won’t open up until some trust has been established, and letting them talk about themselves is an excellent way to develop trust.

As they talk about themselves and their situation, they’re almost sure to turn the conversation toward some of the conflicts they see, although sometimes you may have to ask about them explicitly. You can’t have a conflict discussion without what I call POCR chips, problems, opportunities, changes and risks. We all know to look for problems, which are known dissatisfactions with their situation, but there are several other areas that are also ripe for creating conflict: Opportunities may arise because a new technology now allows them to improve their processes in some way; changes happen all the time that they must respond to, such as their customers’ needs and preferences, competitive actions, new laws; and risks are problems that do not currently exist but might. Listen very carefully for words or phrases that signal problems, opportunities, changes and risks, and encourage them to expand on these when they come up in the conversation.

If they don’t introduce conflict into the conversation, you may need to help them a bit. The simplest way is just to ask them. How’s that going for you? How well is it working? Are you happy with the way things are going? What problems do you see? What areas would you like to improve? Ideally, what would you like to see?

These are fairly open-ended questions and in a best-case scenario the other person will completely open up and spill their guts about all the conflicts they see. But what if they don’t open up? Or what if none of the gaps they identified are something that you can help them with? You may need more targeted and more specific questions. Instead of, What changes are you having to adapt to?, you might ask, How are you adapting to the new antibiotics regulations? Are you concerned at all about supply reliability? Are you comfortable with your relative response times?

When they begin describing their challenges, the need is beginning to come out, but here’s the spot where too many sales are lost. It’s like a fisherman jerking the rod at the first nibble. As soon as the client describes a gap they try to stuff a solution into it, except the solution is too big for the gap. They need to make the gap larger, by getting the client to talk about the cost to them in business and ultimately personal terms. You say your process is too slow, so what? How does that affect your customer response times, and how does that affect your sales, and how does that affect you personally? Did you ever lose a customer because of it?

Don’t assume that they are feeling the pain just because they’re describing the issues. When you ask these questions, they won’t always tell you out loud how it affects their business, but at least they are thinking about it. Just like a good movie, you want to create a plausible crisis that they will feel compelled to find a way out of. This is where the “heart” part of the story really kicks in.

By this point in the story, they’re ready for the satisfactory ending. Your questions now switch to the positive resolution: How would speeding up the process impact your customer satisfaction ratings? What steps would you have to take to get it done by the first quarter? When they answer your questions, they are ready to hear your solution. And, when they hear it, it will be their own idea because it’s their own story, not yours.

Read More
Sales

Slow Down Selling to Speed Up Buying

My friends never take me fishing anymore because I get excited when I feel a nibble and yank the rod too early. I know it’s wrong, but I just can’t help myself. Fortunately for my financial health, I’ve learned to contain my impatience when I sell.

The paradox of selling is that it’s all about results, but if you focus too impatiently on the results during a sales call, bad things can happen. Let’s look at a few, starting from the best case and working downwards:

  • You get the sale but leave additional opportunities on the table in your haste to get to yes, otherwise known as “stumbling over dollars to pick up dimes.”
  • You may sell the solution you intended, only to fail later because you did not take the time to thoroughly and accurately diagnose the problem.
  • The buyer agrees, but you end up losing the deal because you didn’t figure out their place in the decision making process, and you haven’t prepared them to sell your solution internally.
  • Or the buyer may say yes, only to suffer buyer’s remorse when they’ve had a chance to reflect.
  • You may try to close too early and lose your chance, like yanking a hook out of a hungry fish’s mouth.
  • Worse yet, you repel the buyer by appearing pushy or even desperate.

How to speed up by slowing down

Here’s a simple equation to keep in mind:  Patience = Plan + Process + Probe

  • Plan. Have a plan going in. This doesn’t mean that you plod along step by step no matter what happens, but it does mean that you have awareness at all times of where you are according to the plan, so that you can make better-informed reactions to whatever happens.
  • Process. Focus on the process, not the result. There is always so much going on, even in just a two person sales call, that you need to devote your full mental energy and attention being in the present. If you can do that, the future will take care of itself.
  • Probe. Develop the habit of asking just a few more questions. This is especially important in the conflict stage. When you hear about a problem, dig a little deeper into root causes and consequences before suggesting a solution.

That’s the other paradox of selling: the slower you go, the faster you get there.

Now, if I could just get my friends to give me another chance…

Read More
Success Books

The Problem with Social Science Books

I like Malcolm Gladwell and you probably do too; I’ve always been a fan of a certain type of success book, one that is based on science and solid research, and Gladwell did as much as anyone to launch the current genre. But I have to say I don’t like what he has done for social science writing. To be fair, it’s not his fault—it’s the fault of his followers who have tried too hard to copy his success formula.

I’m referring to the “Gladwellization” of science writing, and I think I reached my personal tipping point just a few minutes ago, having just completed Chapter 5 of Eric Barker’s new book, Barking Up the Wrong Tree.

What is Gladwellization? It’s the practice of finding a quirky and fascinating story to anchor each chapter, and then using that story to illustrate the points you’re trying to make. On the face of it, that’s not a bad practice. Stories get our interest, and they can make it easier to absorb and retain their lessons. But there are two problems with this approach:

The first is that all too often the story seems to become the main attraction rather than the vehicle for the lesson. Unless you’re writing fiction for entertainment, the story should have a point—it should not be the point. I enjoyed the story about Joshua Norton, the self-proclaimed Emperor of the United States, who lived in San Francisco in the 19th century, but even just a few minutes after having read the chapter, I can’t for the life of me tell you what the point of the story was. In the long run, what’s more important to remember, the story or the lesson?

The second problem is that when you set out to write a book that will get attention in a crowded market, you have to engage in an arms race of stories. If Gladwell or Pink or the Heaths have used the story, you need to find a better one, usually about an even more quirky or extreme character. But that makes it difficult for the average person to identify with the person, either as a positive or negative role model. As Barker says early in the book, achievement depends to a great extent on the stories we tell ourselves. For this to work, though, we have to believe that we’re capable of acting in accordance with those stories.

We know networking is important, but none of us would ever strive to be like Paul Erdos, a brilliant mathematician whose achievements were exceed only by his bizarre character. We know that it’s important to have a good work-life balance, but we’re unlikely to be swayed by reading about the obsessive and even obscene work habits of the great baseball player Ted Williams, because we simply can’t imagine that happening to us.

When I read a social science book that purports to teach lessons about success, I apply two tests to it. The first is faster and more superficial: did I like reading it, and did it feel like I got good insights? The second test is more rigorous: after I read every chapter I record the lessons I gleaned and my ideas of how I might apply those to practical effect. Often both measures correlate, but sometimes I find that my first intuition was misleading, because the readability of the material obscured the fact that there just was not that much practical, actionable meat.

I’ve long harped on it: Content Is King. Stories are great, but the first rule of communication is to have something worthwhile to say, and then use those stories to make it stick.

Read More
1 22 23 24 25 26 197