fbpx

Practical Eloquence Blog

Book reviews - Presentations - Presentations Books

How Well Does your Presentation Travel?

International travel and communication are so convenient nowadays that it’s easy to forget that people in other cultures think and communicate differently than Americans do. If you make sales presentations in other countries and cultures, you need to adapt your presentations to fit those differences.

I’m working on a project for a multi-national client that involves understanding what works best for presentations in different cultures. While you can find a lot of material about general cultural differences[1], Presenting Across Cultures: How to Adapt Your Business and Sales Presentations in Key Markets Around the World, by Ruben Hernandez, is the only book I have found that specifically addresses the impact of these differences on presentations.

In general, the book is outstanding.  Having taught and made sales presentations in over 20 different countries, I thought I knew a lot about how to adapt my own presentations. Some of what I read in Hernandez’s book validated adjustments I made, but I also learned a lot of new information that makes me wish I could go back and re-do some of them. In particular, I would like to reprise some of the questions I have answered in Asian countries. What I took as straightforward requests for information may have been my questioners’ way of expressing flat-out disagreement.

It also makes the point that some of the things that work best in US presentations, particularly to high level executives, may actually backfire in international settings. For example, I stress the importance of being clear, direct and concise in your presentation. That works in the US because we’re a low-context culture, and most of the meaning in our communications is contained in our words. In high-context cultures such as Asian countries, most of the meaning is contained between the lines, in their mannerisms, tone, and more importantly in what they don’t say. So, being too direct in those cultures will make you seem rude and make the audience uncomfortable.

As another example, it’s usually a good idea for American audiences to clarify and add impact to your points with examples and stories, but Germans interpret these expressions as talking down to them.

The best part of the book is the way Hernandez graphs 13 different dimensions along a line, and presents these visually for each of 16 countries/regions. If you’re planning a presentation overseas, you can turn to each of the countries listed and see differences at a glance, and then read the overall explanations plus a list of dos and don’ts for each.

My main quibble with the book is the small sample size that Hernandez used to calculate each dimension. He tells us that he interviewed 130 internationally-active business people. With 16 countries/regions listed, that works out to eight for each, so don’t get too wrapped up in precise differences between cultures. Still, that’s a bit like a blind man criticizing his guide for only having one eye. Until someone comes along with something that is more extensively researched and validated, this book sets the standard.

The book is arranged by culture, which works well. For my own purposes, I have found it useful to “pivot-table” the material, reorganizing it in a PowerPoint presentation by dimension, with the relevant values for each culture listed beneath.

For starters you will want to read the introductory material, get familiar with your own culture, and compare it to those of others you may present to. But the best use of Presenting across Cultures is as a reference guide that you should pack along with your passport if you have to go overseas to make a business presentation.

By the way, the book is just as valuable if you are a member of the audience. If you’re American, for example, you might judge a presenter harshly for spending too much time on background context, but they may just be doing exactly what seems right to them.

 


[1] Some good examples are: Figuring Foreigners Out, by Storti, Kiss, Bow or Shake Hands, by Morrison and Conaway and Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, by Hofstede, Hofstede, and Minkov.

Read More
Success

You Never Know If a Door is Truly Locked until You Try the Handle

A lot of well-meaning people tell you that you should develop your strengths and follow your passion. The unspoken corollary to that is that you should steer away from your weaknesses. If you were a school counselor, what would you tell a young boy who tried and repeatedly failed to make every team he tried out for? Would you suggest that he try to develop some other strengths?

A young boy from Kansas once faced that question. He yearned to be an athlete, but being weak and uncoordinated he failed at everything he tried. He couldn’t make the baseball or basketball team; he didn’t even try out for football. Turning resentful and rebellious, he began smoking, stealing, and skipping school. Finally, in 9th grade he tried the only sport he hadn’t yet tried: track. At the school tryouts, he burst from the starting line in the 400 meter time trial, briefly leading the field before falling back, exhausted. He didn’t make that team either.

Despite these failures, he desperately wanted to earn a varsity letter so he could fit into the school social scene, so when 10th grade came around, he tried out for the cross-country team, despite not being sure what cross-country really was. The only reason he tried out was that it was the last athletic door available to him. He barely finished the first day’s training run, thanks in part to the fact that the last section of it was downhill. When he got home, he was too tired to eat dinner, and went straight to bed. He could barely walk the next day, and as he left for school he said “Mom, I’ll be home early today. I’m done with that cross-country stuff.” Yet his friends talked him into going back to practice that day, and he barely made the C team—a step below junior varsity.

But somehow, once that door was open something began to click. Despite shin splints and all the other ailments that are likely when someone who has never run before begins intensive training, he improved so rapidly in the first three months that he moved up to the varsity that won the Kansas state championship, and he personally finished 6th in the state meet. When he began training again after the winter break, his rapid progress continued, and the boy who five months before was 14th on his team in the mile time trial, defeated the defending Kansas state champion with a 4:26 mile. He finished 10th grade with a 4:08 best time.

In his junior year young Jim Ryun became the first high school kid to break 4:00 in the mile, and in the summer before his senior year he ran in the 1964 Olympics. Within 3 years, he set a world record that stood for eight years. In 2007 ESPN named him the greatest American high school athlete of all time, ahead of Tiger Woods and Lebron James.

The problem with focusing only on your strengths is that sometimes you don’t know what you don’t know. You may make assumptions about your own strengths and weaknesses based on limited or no experience.

Potential is not always obvious. In developing talent, we tend to notice the kids who excel early, and then put them on a fast track to realizing their potential, supplying the coaches, teachers, facilities and opportunities to get better. Many times, that works. But some physical attributes like speed and size, and mental attributes like wit and a quick mind, can be seen instantly. Endurance, good judgment and other qualities take time to emerge. There are a lot of activities where success does not come quickly, and it’s so easy to give up too early before you see any results. The strengths-based movement sounds really positive, but does it run the risk of closing doors prematurely?

Along the same lines, we’re counseled to find out what we’re good at and follow our passion. But Jim Ryun did not have a passion for running. He didn’t even like it at first; he just saw it as a way to be somebody at school. Sometimes, instead of needing passion to be really good at something, maybe you have to get really good at something in order to develop a passion for it.

Note: Besides the hyperlinked video in this article, most of the facts in this post came from David Epstein’s excellent book, The Sports Gene.

Read More
Book reviews - Presentations - Presentations Books

A Few Good Books on Visual Persuasion

Last weekend, I had an interesting conversation with a lawyer about the proper use of visuals in persuasive presentations. In the courtroom, lawyers have to sell—their buyers may be jurors or judges, but the elements of persuasive appeals are probably no different for them than they are for buyers.[1] We talked about Edward Tufte’s ideas, and he asked me for some suggestions for additional reading, which I thought I would share in this article.

There is no “best” book on persuasive visuals—it all depends on what you’re presenting, to whom, and how many are in the audience. I’ve selected a few of my favorites that cover the range of possible presentation scenarios. To make sense of the order in which these titles are presented, think of a continuum: at the left side is a page densely packed with information, a la Tufte, and at the right side is a ballroom presentation, such as Steve Jobs introducing the iPhone. (Hyperlinks will take you to my more detailed book review.)

Speaking PowerPoint, by Bruce Gabrielle. This excellent book shows that Tufte is wrong when he says that PowerPoint causes poor thinking. Gabrielle shows how to first organize your thoughts for credibility and clarity, and then put them on slides.

Read More
Clear thinking - Presentations

Why You Need Presentation Skills Even If You Never “Present”

Getting in shape for the next meeting?

When I began my work life, I never anticipated that I would have to deliver presentations. In fact, I originally chose banking as a career partly because I thought it would enable me to comfortably indulge my introverted personality. I could crunch numbers all day without having to talk to too many people, and I definitely would never have to confront my greatest fear: having to stand and deliver a presentation to a room full of people.

Fortunately for me, my father, who came of age during WW2, was a great admirer of Winston Churchill and had always stressed the value of being able to speak. So, even though I was terrified at the prospect (or maybe because of it), I accepted a friend’s invitation to attend a Toastmasters meeting. What I learned there literally changed my life. I learned that fear could be overcome, and in fact could improve performance. I learned that speaking to many was as safe as speaking to one, and most of all I learned to enjoy the feeling of having an audience’s full attention, and the thought that my words could influence their thinking and even their behavior in some way.

Since I would come to work late on Friday mornings as a result of Toastmasters attendance, word got around that I could speak to groups, and I gradually got asked to do more and more presentations, both internally and to customers and the community. These opportunities in turn increased my visibility within the bank, to the point that it was perhaps a bit unfair that some of my peers who had the same banking skills and performance suffered by comparison.

Presenting and public speaking were never part of my job description, but the skill that I developed for personal reasons turned out to have a huge influence on my career trajectory.

Read More
1 122 123 124 125 126 197